Friday, December 31, 2010

New Year

New Year Eve

Celebrations for New Year begin from New Year's Eve on 31st December. This is the last day of the Gregorian calendar and the day before New Year's Day. The idea behind New Year's Eve celebration is to bid adieu to the year gone by and give a warm welcome to the coming year. Popular way of celebrating New Year's Eve is to party until the moment of the transition of the year at midnight. 

New Year's Eve is a public non-working holiday in several countries including France, Australia, Argentina, Brazil, New Zealand, Mexico, Greece, the Philippines, and Venezuela. 

New Year Eve Traditions
Tradition of celebrating New Year's Eve vary in several parts of the world due to cultural variations. In most countries people cut cake as the clock strikes for midnight on New Year's Eve and open champagne bottles to express their joys. Given here is a brief description of some of the other most popular and interesting traditions of New Year Eve celebrations. 

Father Time and Baby New Year
A common image of New Year's Eve celebration is the incarnation of Father Time - the old year represented by an old bearded man wearing a sash across his chest with the previous year printed on it. This Father Time hands over his responsibilities to the Baby New Year - the personification of New Year represented by a baby wearing a sash with the new year printed on it. 

Auld Lang Syne
Inspired by an old Scottish tune, the song Auld Lang Syne (meaning 'the good old days') has become the National Anthem of New Year's eve celebration. The song is traditionally sung at the midnight on the New Year's Eve in almost all English speaking countries of the world. The lyrics to the song Auld Lang Syne were written by the poet Robert Burns and published after his death in 1796. Bursting of Firecrackers In most parts of the world, people welcome the New Year by bursting noisy firecrackers. Some even fire celebratory gun-shots. The tradition emerged from an ancient belief that noise and fire helped to dispel evil spirits and bring good-luck. 

Greeting Happy New Year
Just as the clock strikes at midnight on New Year's Day people start Greeting Happy New Year to everyone around. At several places there is also a tradition to kiss one's beloved at midnight. It is said that kissing ensures affections and ties will continue all through the year. To dear ones staying in distant cities, greetings are sent over phone or through SMS and New Year greeting cards. 

Popular New Year Eve Celebrations Around the World
Many countries take pride in their New Year's Eve celebrations but New Year's Eve of Times Square, Trafalgar Square and Sydney are most popular amongst them all.

Happy New Year! 2011

Thursday, December 30, 2010

The acclaimed iranian filmmaker was sentenced to six years in prison today, and banned 20 years.

The acclaimed Iranian filmmaker JAFAR PANAHI winner of the VENICE, CANNES and BERLIN film festivals was sentenced to 6 YEAR OF PRISON and banned from directing and producing films for the next 20 YEARS from AHMADINEJAD dictatorship regime.

Panahi, an outspoken supporter of Iran's opposition green movement, was convicted of gathering, colluding and propaganda against the regime, Farideh Gheyrat told the Iranian state news agency ISNA.

"He is therefore sentenced to six years in prison and also he is banned for 20 years from making any films, writing any scripts, travelling abroad and also giving any interviews to the media including foreign and domestic news organisations," she said. Gheyrat said she would appeal against the conviction.

Panahi won the Camera d'Or award at the Cannes film festival in 1995 for his debut feature, The White Balloon, and took the Golden Lion prize at Venice for his 2000 drama, The Circle. His other films include Crimson Gold and Offside. He is highly regarded around the world but his films are banned at home.

Hamid Dabashi, a professor of Iranian studies at Columbia university, told the Guardian the sentence showed Iran's leaders could not tolerate the arts. "This is a catastrophe for Iran's cinema," he said. "Panahi is now exactly in the most creative phase of his life and by silencing him at this sensitive time, they are killing his art and talent.

"Iran is sending a clear message by this sentence that they don't have any tolerance and can't bear arts, philosophy or anything like that. This is a sentence against the whole culture of Iran. They want the artists to sit at their houses and stop creating art. This is a catastrophe for a whole nation."

Panahi, 49, was initially arrested in July 2009 after participating in a mourning ceremony for the protesters killed in the aftermath of the disputed presidential election. He was released shortly afterwards but was denied permission to leave the country. In February 2010, he was arrested along with his family and colleagues, and taken to Tehran's notorious Evin prison.

Muhammad Rasoulof, one of the film-makers who was arrested at the same time, was also sentenced to six years in jail today.

Senior Hollywood figures including Martin Scorsese, Steven Spielberg, Francis Ford Coppola, and Juliette Binoche condemned his arrest. Binoche held up Pahani's name in protest at the Cannes festival.

In May, he was released on $200,000 (£129,000) bail after several days on hunger strike. He has since been denied permission to attend film festivals where he was invited as a judge, including a recent invitation from the Berlin film festival.

In an interview in September, Panahi said: "When a film-maker does not make films it is as if he is jailed. Even when he is freed from the small jail, he finds himself wandering in a larger jail."

Jafar Panahi, a celebrated Iranian filmmaker who was arrested in February and accused of working on an “anti-regime” film, was sentenced to six years in prison on Saturday in Tehran, his lawyer told an Iranian news agency on Monday.

Mr. Panahi, who had expressed support for Iran’s opposition green movement during post-election protests in 2009, “has also been banned from making films, writing any kind of scripts, traveling abroad and talking to local and foreign media for 20 years,” according to his lawyer, Farideh Gheyrat.

The 50-year-old filmmaker was first detained in July 2009, six weeks after Iran’s disputed presidential election, when he attended a mourning ceremony in Tehran for protesters who were killed during the demonstrations. The following month, Mr. Panahi was allowed to travel to the Montreal Film Festival, where he was the president of the jury, and he made a point of wearing a green scarf to the opening ceremony.

His conviction comes despite a high-profile campaign by fellow filmmakers inside Iran and abroad to win his release. In March, Abbas Kiarostami, Iran’s most famous director, wrote an open letter to Iran’s authorities calling for the immediate release of both Mr. Panahi and another detained filmmaker, Mahmoud Rasoulof, who was also sentenced to six years in prison for his work on the same unfinished film. In April, a group of leading American filmmakers — including Steven Spielberg, Martin Scorsese and Francis Ford Coppola — signed another open letter on Mr. Panahi’s behalf. In May, days after Juliette Binoche was filmed crying as Mr. Panahi’s detention was discussed at the Cannes Film Festival, Mr. Panahi was granted a temporary release on bail.

Among Mr. Panahi’s prize-winning films are
“The White Balloon,” “ The Circle,” “ Offside,” and “ Crimson Gold.”

In an interview with Agence France-Presse in August, Mr. Panahi explained that the film he was shooting with Mr. Rasoulof concerned a “family and the postelection developments.” He added: “When a filmmaker does not make films it is as if he is jailed. Even when he is freed from the small jail, he finds himself wandering in a larger jail. The main question is: why should it be a crime to make a movie? A finished film, well, it can get banned but not the director.”

Last month, Mr. Panahi delivered an impassioned defense of his work as a filmmaker to the court in Tehran. Near the end of his statement, he explained that he loved his country and had no desire to make films anywhere else:

All said, despite all the injustice done to me, I, Jafar Panahi, declare once again that I am an Iranian, I am staying in my country and I like to work in my own country. I love my country, I have paid a price for this love too, and I am willing to pay again if necessary. I have yet another declaration to add to the first one. As shown in my films, I declare that I believe in the right of “the other” to be different, I believe in mutual understanding and respect, as well as in tolerance; the tolerance that forbid me from judgment and hatred. I don’t hate anybody, not even my interrogators.

Despite the international acclaim Iranian filmmakers have brought to their nation in the past two decades, the country’s government has banned many films that have won prizes abroad and shown a surprising fear of fiction films that deal with life in Iran. In 2000, one of Iran’s most popular filmmakers, Mohsen Makhmalbaf, explained that his plans to establish a film school in Tehran in 1996 had been rejected by the government at about the same time he had produced a drama based on his own part in the country’s Islamic revolution, “A Moment of Innocence.” Mr. Makhmalbaf wrote:

I informed the Iranian ministry of culture of my plans to accept 100 students of cinema through a selection exam, and to use new methods to train them for 4 years. But the ministry of culture of the time did not accept. They feared the generation of a new wave of young filmmakers making films in favor of democracy, thus officially announced that one dangerous filmmaker like me was enough for one country and that one hundred others like me were not needed.

Filmography 
"Crimson Gold" (2003)
The Wounded Heads (Yarali Bashlar, 1988)
Kish (1991)
The Friend (Doust, 1992)
The Last Exam (Akharin Emtehan, 1992)
The White Balloon (Badkonake Sefid, 1995)
Ardekoul (1997)
The Mirror (Ayneh, 1997)
The Circle (Dayereh, 2000)
Crimson Gold (Talaye Sorkh, 2003)
Offside (2006)

Awards and honors
Jafar Panahi has won numerous awards up to now. Here are the most important:
HIVOS Cinema Unlimited Award (2007)
PudĂș Award, at the Valdivia International Film Festival 2007 for his life-time artistic accomplishments.
Silver Bear, Berlin Film Festival 2006.
Prix du Jury - Un Certain Regard, Cannes Film Festival 2003.[35]
Golden Lion, Venice Film Festival 2000.
Golden Leopard, Locarno International Film Festival 1997.
Prix de la Camera d'Or, Cannes Film Festival 1995.

Film festival work
Panahi was a jury member at numerous film festivals:
President of the jury of Montreal World Film Festival (2009)
President of the jury of Rotterdam Film Festival (2008)
Chair of the International Film Festival of Kerala Jury (2007)
International Eurasia Film Festival (2007)
Karlovy Vary International Film Festival (2001)

Monday, December 20, 2010

why legendary RGV is splitting a banana into 2 halves instead of eating single solid piece?

Rakta charitra 1 is much more better than 2 in all aspects. But when you prolong one hour story to more than 2 hours with slow motion effects and making two sequels instead of one makes the audience feel awful.


Message on the first screen: "Characters and story are fictitious. No resemblance to reality."
Message on the second screen: "Based on a True Story"
A "controversial" film?


On the editing & camera-work, the least said, the better. It was bad this time. It was an attempt, a different one. Too much use of close-up shots of gangster stubbles and nostril-hairs, 180 or 360 degree turns, shaky handwork during intense scenes, shadow-filming... Some of them were distracting, unlike in the prequel. The camera, as usual, rotates a full 360 degree or is found slanting behind some stairs. In one particular car chase scene, the camera rotates a 180 degrees and the half minute scene is hilariously shown upside down.The loud background score succeeds in charging up the intensity of action sequences. The cinematography was convincing enough.


Still....
when you stretch a small story for more than 2 hours then it becomes a big bore. RGV could have easily put both the movie parts together in 1 piece and that would have made it a great watch.


Many scenes move in slow motion. The technique works at the start but then you see too many scenes following the pattern that it tires you, especially in the end.


On the whole, I personally liked the first part rather than the second, but that is just a personal choice.